ABOUT ADS OF THE WEIRD

With Ads of the Weird, MSNBC.com takes a look at some of the oddest, most eye-catching, controversial and just plain interesting advertising out there today. Primary writer Allison Linn covers the retail and advertising industries for MSNBC.com. The Ads of the Weird team is always interested in hearing what ads have caught your attention, whether it's online, on television or in print.


Burger King’s "virgin" experiment proves socially awkward

Posted: Monday, December 22, 2008 4:00 PM by Allison Linn
Filed Under: ,

When Burger King decided to run a campaign called "Whopper Virgins," with the premise of doing a Whopper versus Big Mac taste test in rural international outposts, you can imagine what they were thinking: Controversy!

People will love it! People will hate it! People will debate it incessantly! It’ll be great!

Perhaps they should have found a way to make a little more interesting.

Burger King (click image for ad)

The ads feature people who live in such rural areas of the world that they have ostensibly never tried, or perhaps even heard of, a burger. After apparently being told to dress in their fanciest traditional outfits, they are trooped into a bland room and handed two burgers.

The results are exceeding awkward.

Footage on the company’s Web site shows the testers unsure how to eat the burger and yet keen not to be impolite. In the television ads, the subjects are seen taking huge bites of the sandwiches, but their responses appear muted: They point at the one they like and briefly confirm their choice.

If they had anything compelling to say about the experience of eating their first burger, you don’t see it in the spots. There’s certainly no evidence that they were converted to a life of fast food and are seeking franchise opportunities.

The online movie offers a little more insight, including one man admitting he prefers seal meat and a few people choosing the Big Mac, saying they have no preference or refusing to try a burger at all. But if there was an "a-ha" moment among the testers, we don’t see it.

Mostly, the ads and the online video come off as a Herculean effort to make something dramatic out of encounters that appear, at best, stilted. When the video reaches the point that they are discussing propane outlets extensively, you really get the sense that they are stretching for drama.

Also, while the company’s self-congratulatory press materials paint the experiment as an example of honesty and transparency, they don’t reveal the most basic piece of information: definitive results of their taste tests, such as how many people tried the burgers and the number of people who preferred each one.

The lack of concrete data raises the question of whether, overall, the Whopper was the favorite, or whether they just choose to feature the anecdotal stories of those that preferred the Whopper.

A few more facts – now that might have been interesting.

Click here to see the ad, or click here to watch the online video.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Who really cares if someone in some other country with different taste buds and taste preferences chooses one burger or the other. Do your test in the U.S.A. so I can relate to who these people are!
Come on! Get a sense of humor. These ads are not about taste tests!!  This is funny stuff, please don't take it seriously!
BK's idea makes me very upset. something like this can destroy a culture and it bothers me a fast food restaurant of all corporations is willing to destroy a culture's values and traditions just so it can sell more burgers. burger king has had some of the worst advertisements on television for years.
I agree.  Sounded controversial at first, but turned into a bore.  (Like so many other things in life...)
PS: I really don't think this ad was "wierd." Wrong word to describe. Maybe, disconcerting a bit... diquieting, but in the end, moving.

Another ad campaign that totally captivated me was The Brawny Guy. The actor was wondrous - I loved him. The commercials were hilarious, delightful and I've bought tons of Brawny because of it.

Unfortunately I also bought Bounty because I forgot it was "Brawny."

So these two ads are probably the best I've ever seen.

Calling the people Burger King Virgins is not the best, though... something better, more clever would have been appreciated i think.
I think the fact that no true statistics were reported was part of the genius of the ad.  I wonder if the people in these parts of the world that never ate a burger are vegetarians.  Are these people vegetarians?  That's okay as neither McDonald's nor Burger King use real meat anyway.
and the American mass media sinks a few inches deeper into the sewer. I hope whoever green lighted this campaign is severely punished in some karmic fashion.
I wonder how many people, if polled, would think you guys are morons for being so critical of this commercial.  Seriously, it just takes a slight sense of humor to get it. Do you get irked that 2 out of 3 dentists prefer Trident, and you want to find out who the 3 dentists are that were polled?

C'mon folks.  It's a cute little ad, and a novel twist on the taste test theme.  I liked the "I prefer whale meat," comment.  
That's what I want to eat!! A food preferred by people whose tastebuds are customarily used to eating either cat, dog, rat, lizard, worm or whale. Mmmmm yummy!!
Well, I'm one that hates this ad. It's known that cultures that have very little heart disease, diabetes, etc...see a major upswing in those same illnesses once they are introduced to western fast food, garbage food.
I don't know what they were thinking...actually whatever it takes to sell more burgers, regardless of the health implications.
This ad is neither funny nor cute but totally tasteless and offensive. It has been much criticized in the UK and should be withdrawn from here in the US
Yes, those commercials are about as bad as the PC/Mac commercials where Mac points out the flaws of Windows while conveniently ignoring their own shortcomings in the same category.  In one, they criticize PC for finally advertising their OS, while Mac is obviously spending money to advertise their OS to criticize PC.  Not to mention how long Apple has been advertising how much it spends on advertising every year.
I find it curious as to how they brought a freshly cooked and prepared whopper as well as a competitor product the big mac(which actually the big N tasty competes more directly with) out to a rural possibly foreign location with no fast food nearby or possibly any kind of facilities to even prepare them freshly for accuracy of the test?...or for that matter, a Mcdonald's rep on hand to assure the Big Mac was even prepared correctly.

Personally, i dont like the big mac's middle bun, theres too much bread these days still in the modern era of lower carbs.  But i also dont like the MASSIve amount of sauce slop that they put on whoppers, its always been too much.
it isn't really about the big mac versus the whopper...it's about cultures willing to be open to what others have. i thought it was a beautiful piece and it even made me cry a bit. it also made me hungry for a whopper and it's 9 am and i live half an hour from the closest burger king!!!
First off, I never like a commercial that is an ad for an ad. The whole "See the full/real ad at our website" commercial always bothers me. You've got my attention now, show me the ad NOW! What will they say about the burger? Anyone gonna take bets on that one?

If they wanted to get us to view the website, it was a pretty pathetic attempt. "Hi, see our website and see if people like our product." Anyone over the age of 3 can guess that the results they choose to show will be pro Burger King. So why would I waste my time viewing it?

If it's to get me to acknowledge the awesomeness of Burger King over McDonalds, why would I care about the opinions of people I don't know and, by Burger King's own statements, don't even know a proper burger?
I found the ad inane and stupid. Yes, fact less but so is most of the swill we wallow in from commercials and corporate dominated opinion based news.

I also remember the great Dannon ad campaign and how well that played. It didn't make me go out and buy more Dannon yogurt but it did open my eyes to a people that were singularly unimpressed with 'modern technology'. Why do they live so long? Because they aren't immersed in the technology... Life just 'is' for them...
I find it ironic that BK would choose people who's regular diets include seal meat, whale blubber, fermented bird embryos, and other "exotic" foods as spokes persons for their product.
Personally, I find Burger King's latest marketing campaign to be extremely imperialistic and xenophobic. First off, I've been to Thailand, specifically Chang Mai. I ate at a Burger King in Chang Mai. The marketing assumes that non-Americans are underprivileged and are in need of choosing a food that is not necessary.

The commercials' message is clear: "Let's bring in our ways into another culture and see how they like big, American food." These ads are revolting, despicable, and completely turn me off to Burger King.
It will be funny to see a Greenland Restaurant doing the same test in America... how do you like seal?

I think it is riduculous to push the taste of beef or pickle on culture that cannot produce this ingredients (or raise the animal; we should leave them alone; if they really want to have a taste of another culture they can travel and discover; we shouldn't go there and push our food, our culture, our religions to them.

Welcome world obesity.
This is one of the worst ad campaigns in a long time.  They so disgust me that I mute them or change the channel.  While I am not an often fast food eater, I certainly will not be going to Burger King at any point.
Well at least it's better than the big headed Burger King "King" in your bed when you wake up.
The one thing I have been wondering about this so-called experiment is how did they transport the Bic Macs and Whoppers to such remote locations and keep them in such commercial worthy conditions?  In every one of the shots they look like burgers they would photograph for advertising.  BK = BS
Why would I want the opinion of someone that has never eaten beef before?  I would be interested in what type of meat they are comparing this to.  I'm afraid it may be something I call a pet.  
I believe this ad was done by CP+B in Miami. The fact that MSNBC would have a blog discussion about it plays right into the agency's hand. The ad itself is rather blah. But the fact it creates any sort of public discussion about political correctness or controversy is certainly to the agency's liking. Whenever this ad is discussed, regardless of context, "Whopper" will be said. And you get the Whopper at Burger King. If the agency can get the Burger King brand on people's lips, there's a better chance those people will put their lips on a Whopper. Burger Cha-Ching! Well done, Alex!
I've never cared for the Burger King commercials.  The mascot guy is real creepy, and it didn't help having them make a commercial with some poor guy waking up with this clown in his bed.

Now they're using the word "virgin" in an ad that is run during all hours of the day.  I didn't really care much for my young son asking me what a virgin is.  Right now he is too young for that discussion.
I don't see why they had to go to all of these different countries when I have had neither a Big Mac nor a Whopper and I'm right here in the USA.

My friends, upon seeing the commercial, commented that of course everyone loved the Whopper, the Big Mac is gross.
These are the stupidest commercials ever.  I don't care who these people are, where they live or what burger they prefer.  It doesn't make me think a whopper is better or make me want to go to burger king for any reason.  Just stupid.
"The lack of concrete data raises the question of whether, overall, the Whopper was the favorite, or whether they just choose to feature the anecdotal stories of those that preferred the Whopper."
--Wow, you sure know a lot about ads.  That would make for a doosie.  I hope in the excitement that they don't forget to explain how they calculated the standard error.  Fascinating, yes!

--Seriously though, this is one commercial I have scene.  Which burger is one going to pick?  The BigMac bought at some earlier point that looks sickly or the fresh-made Whopper that looks better than any Whopper I've ever eaten--well, that was before I stopped eating at the King after a bad experience.  If Allison Linn wants to complain about an ad, she should target the observable deceptive practices of advertising (for instance, food on packaging labels always looks better than how I make it) rather than the pseudo-scientific method of a Gimmick!
Dear MSNBC,

This is now my second plea to find a new ad "critic" (See previous Arby's entry).

I don't mean to offend Ms. Linn, but she continues to either take a simple television advertisement way to seriously or she cannot grasp subtleties in humor. In this case, it's both.

I haven't seen all of the ads, but the ones I have seen seem to be purposefully deadpan. Almost Buster Keaton-esque in their response to eating a hamburger. The humor of the deadpan delivery is heightened by the juxtaposition of the "virgins" wearing their traditional garb.

I'm not saying the ad works. I only find it mildly amusing. But to overly concern yourself with the "a-ha" moment or "concrete data" misses the point of the ad. It's an AD, not scientific research.

If you really want an intelligent negative critique of the ad, you could mention the xenophobic nature of making the "virgins" dress in traditional garb, or ask the question: Do we really need to export obesity and clogged arteries to rural international communities?
At least these commercials are better than the ones featuring the creepy King.  He's something that little kids would have nightmares about.
The marketing campaign succeeded in what it set out to do.  It got everyone talking about it.

While many might argue whether or not it was in distaste, it does not come close to the failed attempt at shock marketing that Quizno's tried several years back with their singing and dancing dead rats.  Lets also not forget the man accused of being raised by a pack of wolves because he was a sloppy eater, in which case the next scene showed him suckling on a wolf's teet.  That campaign has completely and utterly turned me off to eating there for the past 7-8 years.
The burger virgin experiment would be interesting to see first-hand. How so? I'd like to know who got sick after their first bite. Hamburgers to a foreign stomach, I think would be quite a shock to the digestive system of an adult who has never eaten a hamburger before. Children - their stomachs are pretty resilient, and more open to experimentation with foreign foods. But the adults, I think would have a hard time digesting a greasy, American fast-food hamburger if they had never eaten one before.  

Many posts I have seen have implicated that the ad campaign is a joke, and therefore should not be taken seriously. And that is good advice if it wasn't for one factor - Burger King takes this ad campaign very seriously. No ad campaign is a joke - millions are spent to prepare and execute these campaigns; and millions of dollars is something you don't joke about. If this campaign fails - Burger King is the BIG loser. Not only have they wasted millions of dollars amidst a major recession - they also risk their reputation. And that is a BIG deal.
They are trying to sell a product...let's all take a deep breath here people !
They should include footage of these Whopper virgins' trips to bathroom afterwards.

But seriously, I find these ads subtly disturbing and certifiably unfunny.
So..... the message from the ad is, "If you enjoy Burger King, you share the same preferences as ignorant, uneducated, unsophisticated peasants in third world countries".  Great.

I mean really... is that the message that Burger Kings really wants to put out?  Its about as stupid an ad campaign as I've ever seen.  Do they seriously think Americans will buy more of their burgers because we see they are preferred by some toothless hag in upper Mongolia?  Personally, it makes me want to stop eating at Burger King.  After all, I consider myself to be more educated then those people, and if they like something, then it must be pretty bad!  After all, those are the same people that cook dogs and eat unhatched duck embryos.

Whoever thought up this ad campaign should be fired... and then flame broiled!  
How rotten!  If true, they're fiddling with other people's cultures; if it's a joke, it's poking fun at people who are different than we are.  "They were very generous," said the advertisement.  My response?  Thanks to Burger King, they will soon be very fat as well.  Yet another reason for me not to frequent fast food joints.
i myself find the whole thing a hoax because they didnt even say which one was liked better. i like the big-mac!
I agree, Sarah from IL!  That King was positively frightening.  Brian H. - the blog was created to discuss the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of ad campaigns.  The author is simply saying that, with all of the drama that B.K. is promoting by bringing in foreigners to taste the burger, the ad really doesn't prove anything.  And a company should not spend money on something that does not impart anything to the viewer -- information, humor, validation of choice, etc.  

Hey, doesn't someone want to ask the question:  why does Burger King trust foreigners to be more honest about the taste of their burgers than people who eat them everyday?  Why do they think that WE would trust them more than our own opinions, especially since they wouldn't know a good burger period?
I thought these ads were tongue-in-cheek and not serious -- like the King himself. Oh my, is he for real too?
Burger King has issued so many awkward ads lately that I am not surprised they have elevated that awkwardness to the downright boring.  BUT I am glad to not have to cringe at the creepy King!
I haven't gone to the website to watch the videos, but I'm wondering why we're taking at face value that all these taste-test participants aren't actors playing their roles specifically for a deadpan humor effect. I mean, that's what I thought when I saw the spot. The quality is too good, the lighting is too even for it to be an outdoor setting with a backdrop, and the sound is almost non-existant in the spots I've seen. I see that and it tells me it was done in the studio. Much cheaper than flying a camera crew all over the world, huh?

Also, I think the intellectual point they are going for here is to suggest that even if someone has never seen a burger *ad*, and doesn't have a preconceived idea about what a burger should taste like, the Whopper will win out as better food. Of course, tthe anti-intellectual point is that people in other cultures wear weird outfits to taste-tests. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. I think it's just a tonal miss that too many people are reading more into than is there since the thematic focus is a mess and doesn't tell the audience how to think about the spot. oh, well.
It amazes me how many people here somehow think Burger King just destroyed these people's culture.  If eating one burger was the last straw for their societies, I'm pretty sure things weren't too stable prior to that first bite.

That is if you believe that these were actual real people from remote areas of the world in the first place and not some clever attempt at satire on the ridiculousness of taste-test ads and the Soda/Burger Wars in general.

People need to lighten up.  If your biggest cause for concern over the health of our planet and species is Burger Ads, you're leading a pretty sweet life I'm guessing.
All I could hear was six-year-olds all over the country asking "mommy what's a virgin?"
And isn't the implication that Burger King is taking their virginity? Wierd? Yes, but creepy is more to the point.
I ate my first Big Mac, at the first Big Mac outlet in Sydney Australia, about 30 odd years ago. Ate the hamburgers produced by the original Burgher King at Ludenham outer syney suberb. A small shop that produced hamburgers a couple at a time on a hot plate. The name Burgher King was eventually bought out in Australia by Hungry Jacks, to become the fast food outlet that it is today. Out of the three style of hamburgers I prefer the original Burgher King from Ludenham, hand crafted with tender loving care. The original recipe was. A buttered split round bread bun from the local bakery, minced beef, flattened on the hot plate. This was placed on the bun with fried sliced onion,lettuce, a slice of tomatoe, and a slice of beetroot. A special had a slice of pineapple usually fried on the hot plate. Unfortunatly nothing today even resembles this, perhaps if the participents had been given an original Australian Burger King they may have had amazed delight on their faces instead of bland disinterest. Oh how the modern generation have missed out on the pleasures of the past.
Why do we care what BK advertises?
Why do we care what BK advertises?
TRASH!  It's off to  Chick-fil-A  for me
i was watching the "bizarre foods" show a few weeks ago where the stocky bald guy goes around the world and eats their weird foods....well at one stop they offer him fresh blood to drink (goat i think) and the usual all kinds of other nasty food thats par for the show (mostly parts of the animal that americans normally throw away).  our bald american friend thought it was gross of course, but appreciatively obliged, and in return offered them some cheese.  or did he just tell them about cheese?  i cant remember.  what i do recall is that they all nearly threw up in their mouths at the thought of eating cheese--rotten milk clotted together and cut into chunks!!???--they squealed.  EEEWWWW!

there are many people in the world who would never even put a piece of cheese in their mouths, let alone a whopper.  i dont even know if this is real; if it is, its likely the equivalent of "which do you prefer: chicken beaks on a stick, or rat tar tar?"  not quite the ringing endorsement BK is letting on.
When you are raised on boiled pig-nuts and flash-fried chicken innards your taste-buds may be pre-conditioned to eat just about anything! I wonder if they would enjoy washing down Burgerking's finest with American PABST blue ribbon swill beer, reminiscient of fine unadulterated pony urine?
Who made the Big Mac's? Was McDonalds with them as well for this, winner gets to make the commercial? or did BK fry/nuke up McD's burgers?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):