ABOUT ADS OF THE WEIRD

With Ads of the Weird, MSNBC.com takes a look at some of the oddest, most eye-catching, controversial and just plain interesting advertising out there today. Primary writer Allison Linn covers the retail and advertising industries for MSNBC.com. The Ads of the Weird team is always interested in hearing what ads have caught your attention, whether it's online, on television or in print.


Microsoft’s new advertising Vista

Posted: Monday, August 04, 2008 4:00 PM by Allison Linn
Filed Under:

This is how bad things have gotten for Microsoft Corp.: The software behemoth has a virtual monopoly in computer operating systems, and yet it still can’t get people to buy the latest version of its flagship product, Windows.

In fact, things are so bleak for Windows Vista that customers have actually launched campaigns aimed at saving Vista’s stiffest competition -- the previous version of Windows, XP, which is now so old in technology years that it should qualify for Social Security.

To Microsoft’s credit, the company knows it has a problem, and it has decided to address it directly with an ad campaign arguing that the product isn’t as bad as people think it is. To their detriment, they’ve fumbled that, too.

(Msnbc.com is a joint venture of Microsoft and NBC Universal.)

Image: The Mojave Experiment
Microsoft

A new campaign, called the "Mojave Experiment," shows a series of regular users who seem to like Windows Vista a lot -- as long as they don’t think it’s Windows Vista. Instead, the users have been told that they are seeing a demonstration of "Mojave," an even newer version of the operating system.

The campaign also includes many of the negative things people have heard about Vista, to get a sense of why so many people think they won’t like it.

The idea behind that is apparently to show that there is little context behind these suppositions. But here’s the problem: there’s also little context to this campaign.

We don’t actually see much footage of people trying Windows Vista, so we don’t know how much they actually did themselves, versus how much they were shown by an experienced marketer.

That’s important because it’s one thing for a paid expert to walk people through a demonstration on a high-powered computer, with all the bells and whistles installed and the latest components added. It’s quite another to try to play your favorite, 5-year-old computer game on the machine, import your family photos or hook up that ancient printer without the benefit of tech support.

We also don’t know whether the subjects were able to directly address the issues users have complained about, such as sluggishness with older or cheaper computers, or incompatibility with existing products.

Plus, we don’t know whether the people they show are a representative sample of the public. Microsoft says it polled 140 people, and most of them liked "Mojave" better than they thought they’d like Vista. But the company doesn’t say who conducted the interviews or offer other evidence of whether this was an unbiased experiment.

In short, we feel manipulated, not convinced.

Elsewhere in the campaign, Microsoft takes a page from movie promoters and pulls a one-liner from a long review of Vista. The company boasts that The New York Times "raved" about the operating system when it first came out, writing "Windows Vista is beautiful."

In fact, the Times was talking about the actual physical appearance of Vista, not the compatibility issues and other problems users have complained about. The actual article’s headline reads: "Vista Wins on Looks. As for Lacks …"

Faced with an unpopular operating system, Microsoft is right to face its detractors head on. It’s just taken the wrong approach.

Click here to view the campaign.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

When I heard that Micro Soft would present its new OS to the world, I was as sceptical as the next guy. At the time, my old computer was ancient and about to have the Big One. I purchased a new Dell desk top with more power and memory than I could afford, but bought it anyway. it came preloaded with Vista Home Premium and It hasn't let me down yet. I've had it since Vista came out and it automatically loads all the new updates and everything when needed. I think as long as you have the machine for Vista, you shouldn't have a problem. I use my machine extensively, daily.
As an unsatisfied Vista user, I am not surprised. I own a small business with a network and several workstations. I own a laptop with vista and last year upgraded pcs with Vista pre-loaded. What a huge mistake!!! Printers, scanners, fax software all claimed to have compatible drivers, but nothing worked. I was fortunate to beg my hardware supplier to provide me with a disk to rollback to XP. Otherwise the cost would have been thousands for replacements. It was not pretty.
I watched the videos on the Mojave videos. What's really interesting about it is how accurately the subjects reponses were with my own.  I installed Vista on my computer at home in February, and I've loved it since.  Sure, some things are annoying, but they're easily handled.  As I recall, many (myself included) had the same reservations about XP.  While I run both OS's on my machines, I do have to admit that I find it annoying that Vista gets such a bad reception by way of media outlets.  I love the Mojave tagline, "See for yourself.  Decide for yourself."  Good stuff!
Here is a novel approach . . . . why don't they just fix the damn problems?  Just an idea?
It's sad that with Microsoft's great wealth and knowledge pool and experience, this is the best they can come up with to justify Vista, if they would just stop trying to please and do 'everything' and focus on trimming the fat off the OS and making it do what it's designed to do, we would jump onboard, just how they went from Windows 2000 to XP. 2000 was a great nice operating system, yet the managed to make it better.

The other thing they botched is their pricing table.. why have so many flavors when a 'business' version and a 'home' version would do??

Microsoft: Are you 'REALLY' listening to us customers, how long do we have to 'YELL' for you to listen to us and stop pushing us to go the Open Source way??? Cpme out of the 90's already. PLEASE!
One more comment:

Microsoft: When WILL you start optimizing your code.. the fact that storage is now very cheap, doesnt justify the fact why you 'need' 6GB of free space to install the OS. Why in the world do you need 6GB of space to give us an 'layer' to the web and programs, when XP and 2000 took less than 2gb and did just fine.. is AEROGLASS really that heavy?

Stop making us feel like we're yelling into the ocean, you have enough money and resources to do better than this PLEASE.
What a clever approach to challenging the stigma Microsoft faces with Vista.  The Mojave Experiment excellently highlights the plain and simple fact that while few people are actually aware of the real problems within Vista, most people claim to dislike it having had little or no experience using it.  I know, I sound like a Microsoft fan-boy now but honest I’m not.  I even use Apple monitors   

I've tested Microsoft products since the DOS days.  Early beta and pre-release versions of Windows Vista are not among the finest memories Microsoft has shared with the technology community.  I, like many others, were concerned that initially its hardware demand would require many people upgrade or replace their existing PC just to run it, while offering little tangible return other than a little bit of eye candy.  Even then, much of the appearance-based enhancements in Vista were already available as third-party add-ons to Windows XP which ran fine on that decrepit Pentium III.  This small return on a large consumer investment was only made to look worse by the fact that the big names in the computer industry were slow or reluctant to release launch-date drivers in support of legacy hardware.  Basically, what Microsoft was telling the world was that they were replacing XP with a new and exciting operating system and that they expected everyone to be willing to replace everything they had in order to enjoy the cool new look of the "Start Bar".  To the average user the sparse new features of Vista did not warrant such an upfront cost in hardware replacement due largely to driver unavailability.  I can certainly understand the complaints and the cause for so much trepidation concerning the adoption of a new operating system, but in today’s computing world things are different.  Even the entry-level offerings from major computer boxers boast hardware hefty enough to support Vista and the demand for drivers has been met too.  Many PC component and peripheral manufacturers have caught up so well that they are now going back through their catalogs to write new drivers for their older equipment.  I’ve recently replaced my old PC with a new one running Windows Vista Ultimate Service Pack 1 and I have been thoroughly pleased at its performance.  I use the heck out of my PC too; handling tasks like filtering a multi-layer 1,000MB image in Photoshop and then printing it on HP’s latest Large-Format Z3100 printer.  The software and hardware play nice all day.  My productivity has markedly improved, thanks largely to the hardware, but all that to say that Vista has not brought down my computing world leaving me to tear my clothes and dump ashes over my head in shame.
 
The PC market is constantly changing.  Each year brings bigger (or sometimes smaller), better, and faster hardware.  To remain cross with Microsoft because the average system at launch could barely handle the new operating system is not exactly fair.  With so many cogs in the clock, I hardly consider it fair either that Microsoft is solely to blame for the delay in support from the manufacturers for delivering drivers for their own products.  Think about the task Microsoft faces!  Who else has been willing to provide an operating system that can support open-ended acceptability of multi-vendor hardware?  Steve Jobs put your hand down; it’s always easy to make the best hand when you hold all the cards in the deck.  
The only way I will buy Vista is when they lower the price. I cannot see why Microsoft expects the public to pay $150-$300 dollars for a system that is not stable, and will cause a lot of personal stress when it crashes and looses all of my personal files and photos.
I use Windows XP Pro, and do not have any problems with it, as it is stable.
Yup give MS Windows OS another 5 years and they're done. Mac will rule once again. Bye Bye gates and Balmer.
I have Vista on 3 computers a Sony, an HP and one I built, I only have issues on the Sony, but it seems to be Sony software that's doing it. Bottom Line is I'd rather have the occasional blip than get locked into a black box approach to a hardware software synthesis that's not upgradeable.
I was always very satisfied with XP myself, and my attitude was, 'Why change if what I've got is working fine?' Then somebody else in my household bought a new Dell notebook off eBay, and it came with Vista installed, and I fell in love with its looks, as it really is a prettier-looking interface, and I liked its new sounds. There are also several other, more technical things I like about it now that I'm actually using it, but before I could install it, my 3-year-old HP Pavilion notebook's memory had to be upgraded to 1GB, which cost me about $130.  After I did this and installed Vista, I discovered that the kinks still hadn't been worked out of it well enough yet for it to run completely without any problems on my computer. I only had one minor problem with it, but I was paranoid because of all the rumors, and I was afraid other problems might crop up, so I went back to XP.  Then, just recently, within the last two months, I discovered Vista Service Pack 1 has been released, so I cleaned off my hard drive, reinstalled Vista, installed the service pack, and I can tell you, I absolutely love Windows Vista now.  Looks matter, and its physical appearance alone is reason enough to want this operating system... but its technology is newer too, and it's a much more security-rich system than XP ever was.  If your computer can run XP Professional, and if your memory can be upgraded to at least 1 gigabyte, you can run Vista Home Basic, and don't let that name fool you. "Home Basic," still tops "XP Professional."
Vista seems to be the new Windows ME, which was probably the worst operating system the world has ever seen.
As a consumer who is considering the purchase of a new computer, most of which now include Vista, I would appreciate a link to a source that includes an evaluation and comparison of Vista both good and bad, to assist me in deciding if this purchase with Vista is worth making.
Over a year and a half ago my wife and I bought her a laptop. A free version of Vista came with it as it was the transition period and my wife didn't want to be left behind in a technical waistland.
I installed it in 8 hours with online help from Microsoft. Make a long story short: its been a nightmare. I'd heard it was a memory hog, but I had no idea how much or the constant video card conflict I'd have.

Can XP be reinstalled with confidence by a geek at Best Buy? or should I do what my wife origionally wanted and get a Mac?

The software I use is best operated on a PC, but I'm not buying another one till I know Vista is long dead, not just resusitated and given some lipstick.

It's all media hype!  I've been a software developer for over 14 years and I have converted all of my computers over to Vista without ANY problems.  In fact, I love the new features of Vista and run a complete photography company on Vista!  More people are bitching about Microsoft because others do.  We can find issues in EVERY product on the planet.  People pinpoint Microsoft because Microsoft has lots of money, nothing else.

I have a Compaq XP Home system and an HP Vista Ultimate system. Side by side. I had hoped to leave the XP behind.  Do not kid yourself: Vista is really bad.  Most, repeat *most*, of my product software will not work under Vista.  I need to buy new versions of these?!  I bought extra RAM just to make Vista work: Vista will not work on the 1GB that came with the HP. 500MB on XP is much faster than 4GB on the Vista. On XP, DVD movies play just fine. On the Vista, fast parts get skipped. With Vista Service Pack 1, the HP video driver crashes, and crashes, and crashes.  I need the XP.  I do not need the Vista.
Vista Home Preminum is A-OK with me.  My old computer came over with the Pilgrams so a new purchase was a must.  3G Ram and 250G of memory.....Vista is working perfectly.  Bought this at Best Buy (tower,large flat screen, keyboard, mouse and the package was a free scanner-printer. $539
I had Windows XP then built a computer and put Vista on it, so that I could understand how it works.  All of my friends come to me to help them out with there computers, so I needed to know. Knowing that all PC computers would have Vista on them soon enough.  I don't really see what everyone is complaining about or why you  would keep using an out of date product to conduct your buisness or personal matters on.  Security is the first thing that comes to mind.   Windows XP has been around long enough for  "Hackers" (people who know the software better than the developer) to manipulate everything in and around it.  As for the stability of Vista, I believe its just hype.  I have had no problems from Vista! None.  Don't be scared... Learn the software, embrace Vista... :-)
I've been using Vista since release and it certainly has come a long way.  I will not argue that when it was first released it was a horrible experience, although that wasn't Microsofts fault entirely.  Many device drivers from 3rd party companies were not working even though they were "Vista compatible".  Now it has been awhile since the OS was released and after SP1 I have no more complaints. The slow file transfer issues have been resolved and I've not had a crash in many moons.  It's a great OS; it's just a shame that too many people have written it off after seeing a couple of Apple commercials.
@Chuck Kelly, Yuma, AZ

Don't blame MS because HP cannot update their drivers to work correctly with the OS.  If you should be mad at anyone it should be HP
Only one comment about Vista...
S  L  O  W...
S  L  O  W...
S    L    O    W   .  .  .
S      L     O     W   .  .  .
Need I say more?
All this talk cracks me up.  I have been using Windows XP and a MAC simultaneously for years.  Finally, I just gave away my Windows machine because I was almost NEVER using it.  I'm not one of those cultic Mac users who say "Mac or nothing" - but I have to give the devil his due...  My mac is a SUPERIOR operating system - period.  
Vista is great if you have no idea what you're doing on a computer with internet access.  I, on the other hand, like to do things like play games and run high res videos on my computer.  Vista can't handle it.  The graphics and processing power the OS sucks require me to set graphics to the lowest setting possible if I'm even going to get a passing speed for my games and high res vidoes jump and skip all the time.  Stay away from vista.
Oh, and Peter B, Microsoft has been angling to buy out Mac as soon as Google puts out its  OS (which I will immediately replace Vista with).
I'm still rolling on Windows 2000 and hanging on very finely, thanks alot. I do need a new system, but Vista is holding me back.
MS has rushed to push out every new Windows before it's ready. Then has to scramble with patches. What's wrong with having something WORKING before selling it ???
Mac is the smart choice people. Unless of course you have nothing to complain about; therefore, keep windows machines and you'll have plenty complaints for the rest of your life.
The "Mojave" campaign is a hoot!  Especially when you learn that each of the "converts" was introduced to the "new" OS for all of about 20 minutes with their own personal Microsoft engineer standing over their shoulder to "help".  

No word on whether or not UAC was turned off or Aero was tweaked so screens actually came up with some speed or if the device drivers were previously checked or how many hours had been spent by Microsoft "debugging" the new machines before allowing civilians to see them.  

In other words, this "test" was decidedly fixed - sort of like the old days when the car companies used to supply fully shaken down (and in some cases hand-built) vehicles to the car magazines as "typical production vehicles" for testing.  Now the car magazines generally get their test vehicles by ordering them using blind fronts to stop such practices.

Mojave was a good cover name - since any pretense of objectivity (or honesty) on Microsoft's part was a mirage.  
I'm an IT professional. I suffered with my brand new Lenovo (X61t - preinstalled with Vista Business) for a couple of months before asking my hardware administrator to 'upgrade' it back to XP. Instant relief! I don't know a single person who prefers Vista to XP and that includes the full demographic range of family members, friends and professional associates.

------------------
Money Quote:
... it’s one thing for a paid expert to walk people through a demonstration on a high-powered computer, with all the bells and whistles installed and the latest components added. It’s quite another to try to play your favorite, 5-year-old computer game on the machine, import your family photos or hook up that ancient printer without the benefit of tech support.
------------------

Exactly! I'd love to see a documentary three months from now, from the exact same individuals, telling about how their real-world encounter with Vista compares with the optimized and sanitized dog-and-pony show which was demonstrated to them during the 'Mojave Experiment'.
I have Windows Vista on my laptop (64-bit) and desktop and love it. No compatibly problems - all my USB devices fired up just fine.
Vista is the best thing ever. Most people that complain about vista haven't used it or tried using it on one of those bargain $200 pcs that would have trouble just surfing the internet on windows xp. Every computer in my house runs windows vista with the except of my work laptop that I can't upgrade. I have vista business on my personal dell laptop, vista home premium on my wife's laptop, and vista ultimate on my desktop that I use for online gaming. Yes if you want to do high demanding tasks like online gaming your going to need at least a core 2 or core 2 quad processor and 4GB of RAM, but those in the gaming world expect and know that. If all you are going to do is web surfing and word processing 2GB of RAM will work fine. I had no issues installing Vista on my older Dell Laptop with a Pentium 4 processor and 2 GB of RAM. If you have good quality hardware and software you can get updated vista drivers and patches without problem.



The only issues I have is that certain features are disabled/removed in certain versions. Business lacks native dvd playback support and home premium isn't capable of joining a domain. If you want all the bells and whistles you will need to buy ultimate.
This may sound like an appeal to authority. I suppose it is...

I have a master degree in CIS, have scores of certifications, including MCSE, and have worked (in a heavily-technical aspect) of the computer industry for over 15 years.

I've loaded Vista on a half dozen computers now, and frankly I'm disgusted. It is mired with sluggish performance, irritating security features, and a bloated code base. Honestly, XP required 1.5 gigs , and now we need over 6 gigs for Vista. What on EARTH is in this monster? How could it NOT be an absolute pig for resources? As for drivers, who can blame companies for not wanting to commit resources to build drivers for an OS that no one (relatively speaking) wants?

I tell everyone I know. Stay away from Vista, even if it means putting off buying a computer. We also wont be upgrading where I work.
I'd love Vista too if all I did was use it to do simple tasks like email, internet and office.

Vista when in the arena of using it for high-end performance, such as gaming, video editing, graphic design or multi-media above low end youtube videos, the issues begin to pile up.  Performance, incompatibility, stability, cost and market adoption all become a very key factor.  Totally agree with the Author here.  

I'm not kidding myself by saying XP is perfect, it has a good share of issues still but that's just it.  I had Vista and went back to XP because my performance suffered when using Vista due to crashes, software not being compatible, sluggishness despite upgrades, etc.  I don't care who's fault it is, that's not my problem.  If it doesn't work with what I need it to work with, then why use it regardless of who's to blame for it's problems?

That's why MS isn't addressing.  I'm not obligated to them, but this new campaign makes it seem that it's ME that's the issue, not their poor release, low adoption by the software market, their building an OS on top of a crumbling software structure or their lack of combating marketing when they should have.

I work in I.T., so I upgraded to Vista on my desktop a few months after it came out.  No problem whatsoever with my peripherals or software, but file copying was slow, and there were crashes - although far more gracefully handled than with XP.

I also upgraded my 5 year old laptop (which was a little sluggish with XP) shortly thereafter.  It bogged it down and made it completely useless.

Then Service Pack 1 came out.  My desktop machine is super-stable, and relatively speedy (it's 4 years old w/ 1.5GB RAM).  When I applied the SP to the laptop, not only is it useable again, it's faster and more stable than it ever was under XP.

They had problems with Vista early on, but the SP seems to have addressed every problem I've seen.  I don't blame people for not wanting to upgrade, but they should take another look before they write it off completely.
I bought my mother a new DELL Inspiron laptop. At the time, Dell didn't offer the choice between XP or Vista. (Dell has since re-instated) so I was forced into buying Vista for her laptop. I had it loaded with the Dell recommended RAM (512Mb Ram)and from moment one, I was astonished at how painfully slow the system was. Came with plenty of HD space, really nice ATI video card, but you could retrieve a fresh cup of coffee while waiting for system folders to open.  Finally after  6 months I bought and installed the maximum RAM allowed. Finally, after further graphics preferences tweaking, her new system was running comparable to my trusty XP laptop. All this to say...VISTA is a major technology miscalculation. MS should rethink and develop a stable, usable platform that compliments it's users, not shame and ridicule the intelligence of their users, as this whole campaign appears to do.
Nice effort MS...Thank you for not fixing the problems that are NOT imaginary so you can turn a blindeye and blame your users instead.
Pathetic....
I love Vista! First computer was Win 3.11. You need to grow with your computer. New computer, more power etc. means Vista is a great choice!

Now what I don't like it that damned digital cd/radio in my jeep! Er, give me back that dial the station numbers options :)
"Yup give MS Windows OS another 5 years and they're done. Mac will rule once again. Bye Bye gates and Balmer. "
         -Peter B, Scottsdale, Arizona

Wow, are you clueless.  Mac never did rule, for one. Two, they run on controlled, overpriced hardware that requires extensive, extensive, extensive testing before any software can receive the Apple logo.  Does it work well?  Yes.  Do you pay 50% more?  Yes.
The only problem I have had with Vista is not having drivers for older equipment, like scanners.  I have 3 computers running Vista and have NO problems with the system, especially with speed.  I do very intensive graphics (movie and photo editing) with Adobe Creative Suite CS3 with NO problems.  On my one remaining XP computer, it will occasionally hang.
I am a college student and I talk to people all the time who are exactly like the ones shown in the "Mojave Experiment" ad. They have preconcieved notions about Vista without actually having any hands on experience. Here's what I run Vista on: Compaq presario V5000, Intel Celeron M 1.46 GHz, 1GB RAM, Intel 945 integrated graphics. Basically, my laptop is old and the hardware is basic, yet I run Vista on it without any problems from the operating system. I've never had the system crash, I haven't had any driver issues, and I certainly never "lost" any of my personal files, media or any such thing. I do a lot on this pc including web design and development and while I do have problems because of the hardware (i.e. multitasking is a no go because of the processor) I haven't experienced any of the horror espoused by some people. I'm glad microsoft put out this commercial. Although I'm not sure that showing people they are stupid is the best way to convince them to use your product, it's refreshing to see an ad that reflects what I experience on a daily basis. Seriously people, take the time to pick up a book and learn how to make your OS more stable through proper maintenence, and I would wager that 80% of your problems would go away.
I have a dual boot setup - allowing me to still stay with my XP Pro and yet learn Vista. Software and hardware wise, if the developer has not made the product Vista ready - I just go to my XP Pro configuration. As for the Vista ready products - that's what keeps me exploring and pleased with something new. Vista hasn't made me into a Mac guy - I already use a Mac, too. Collectively, what I like the most about Vista is my 64-bit installation complete with drivers. That's a plus for me and the new games coming out for that platform.
Vista has been awesome. On my little laptop with one gig of ram it runs very fast. Yeah, its a little tweaked out, a lot of the bloat's been removed. Do a google search on how to tweak vista, and it will run a lot faster. I still have the eye candy on and I can run a virtual machine, and test the games I write under visual studio, and iTunes all at the same time. It runs pretty much the same as XP, it just needs a little work. It's been an easy to use system and all of my programs run just fine on it.
I also dual boot with xp pro and vista. Other than the fact I have to replace my printer and scanner AND the retail price for vista is outrageous, I find myself choosing vista more often than not. The biggest con is permissions and security. I'm the administrator, damn-it I should be able access my own files and not have to fight the OS for control.
Fact:
The First Release of Windowd Vista was Bugged and the support Driver wise for old peripherals was dismal at best.

But After Service Pack (1)one and more than One Year of MFG's delivering drivers for new equipment and retro engineering drivers for older hardware it is a very good and stable Piece of Software.

The only part is find annoying and it goes away after a while is the Security questions when youre loading new software into the pc. Once youre not installing stuff every 15 mins the system is very pleasing.

Regarding Security questions Microsoft could make it so that a setting will automatically allow all security questions but generate a log of all actions being taken so that if something goes wrong you could unde the actions by going through a Log manager of sorts. (Idea Copyright Tomas Cruz)

I have used every version of windows since Dos days. I currently have 3 versions of Vista. I do encounter problems with Vista, but not any more than with any other version. The benefits of this system far outwiegh any difficulties I've encountered. I'm looking forward to the day when windows compatable programs can fully utilize the multi-core processor technology that is currently the new wave for the future.
I'd just like to comment on the nature of this Blog in general. This piece like all the others I can find here is overwhelmingly negative and short sided as any piece of journalism so I won't call it that. Instead even as the plain opinion piece it is it's cynicism and derision don't make up for it's overall vaporishness I did however find this entry ironic since it's it's just like Vista, it is a whole lot of unnecessary fluff added onto something that was solid to begin with and just needed to be optimized. MSNBC ditch this Blog and post real news with out feeling or interpretation and Microsoft ditch Vista and give us an stripped down simple version of XP with modern performance coding for new hardware that's 64 bit. Do that and all those trust fund jobless wonderkinds from the Mac world will switch their adds from "Switch" to "please come back! You can use your new ipods as Wii style mice for our new wana be half Linux underperforming OS...if you pay is $40 bucks a year!"
Grrr less slackers more hackers!
I got Vista when it 1st came out.  Does games and video better than anything out there.  Now to the reality.  I do a lot of programming for the web and development and find my Vista collects dust while I use my Linux box.  10 years from now it won't be MS or MAC but opensource.  
didn't Microsoft announce last week that they have made sixty billion in revenue for vista and sold over a hundred million copies.  I don't think they hurting when it comes to Vista Sales.
Vista is a memory hog, kinda slow and very stable.  I have absolutely NO PROBLEMS.  

A new computer every 5 years or so will keep you from complaining so much.  My 6 month old computer is old now.  Come on.
Why should I upgrade to Windows Vista when everything is working smoothly on Windows XP? Back in 2002, I remember the nightmares of Windows XP: I wasted a lot of time on XP because there were compatibility issues when XP made its debut, and everything got crushed. Oh God, don't bring my old memories back.  
As an early adopter of Vista I can't say I am very happy with it - in fact I hate it.  First I did not buy cheap computers.  The first computer was pretty wiz bang with Vista Home Premium, which I upgrade to Vista Ultimate 32 bit; the only problem is it kept killing mother boards.  I had my XP computer refurbished "just in case," which turned out to be fortuitous as the first Vista box ate 4 motherboards before HP supplied me with a brand new computer.  The new computer uses Vista Ultimate 64 and it is beyond sluggish.  I can literally count to 10 any time the user account control is initiated, and then count to 10 again slowly while the machine comes back up after my response.  How often do I wind up doing that, well how often does one install an update?  It even requests my persmission to run system programs.  

Why am I using Ultimate? I decided it would be nice to encrypt my computer to protect my client's data. All in all the head ache sure has not been worth it.  

My other complaint is that old software and some old hardware doesn't work with Vista, so if anybody tells you it will - they are selling you a bill of goods.  It has cost me thousands of dollars to upgrade my software, as for the hardware - thank goodness I refurbed that XP box.  Even new software doesn't work well on the 64 bit version, including Microsoft Software.  This operating system is just plain buggy.  

Save often and save early has become my mantra, lest you lose everything to the spinning blue ball of death.  
Ho-boy, looks M$ has sent some their shills over to pump up Vista's bad image again.  I guess this happens whenever a major story on Vista appears in a national publication on the internet.

I've had nightmares with Vista from day one doing an upgrade from XP to Vista.  I ran Microsoft's Upgrade Tool to tell me which version of Windbloze would work best on my 2005 machine, and it determined that Vista Business Edition would be the best version for my particular hardware.  It also mentioned some drivers that I needed to upgrade for my ATI card and sound drivers (which I found) and my printer driver (which I didn't).

After spending three or four hours installing it, I finally got it to the desktop and it crawled just opening IE7 or a search window.  File transfers from USB sticks had about the same performance as the old USB 1.1 ports.  Pathetic.

Fortunately I Ghosted my HD with my previous version of XP so it was a snap to restore, but I remain unimpressed.

A couple of questions I have to ask is this; Does Vista make your computing experience more productive?  
and...  Is there anything I can do in Vista that I can't do in XP?  

Once you decide that, then you'll know which way to go


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):