ABOUT ADS OF THE WEIRD

With Ads of the Weird, MSNBC.com takes a look at some of the oddest, most eye-catching, controversial and just plain interesting advertising out there today. Primary writer Allison Linn covers the retail and advertising industries for MSNBC.com. The Ads of the Weird team is always interested in hearing what ads have caught your attention, whether it's online, on television or in print.


“Mad Men” revels in 1960, and Jack Daniel’s

Posted: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:30 AM by Allison Linn
Filed Under: ,

“Mad Men,” a new TV show about an advertising firm from cable network AMC, is set in 1960 amid a haze of smoke and booze that’s meant to reinforce the authenticity of the series.

The retro atmosphere also provides a convenient foil for pitching Jack Daniel’s, whose sponsorship of the 13-episode first season includes plans to feature the brand by name in three forthcoming episodes.

Yet you won’t hear the words “Jack Daniel’s” in the first episode, which premieres Thursday. Instead, unlabeled bottles of brown liquid adorn every office credenza, and when the characters are done drinking in their offices they head out to a favorite watering hole to order more of the same.

AMCTV

Arlene Manos, president of national advertising sales for AMC parent Rainbow Media, said the Jack Daniel’s sponsorship was a natural because drinking whiskey was so common in the early 1960s era. But while the show actively pursued the sponsorship, they didn’t want the product placement to overwhelm it.

“If we had one in every episode, that would be too much,” she said.

In an age when more and more people are using digital video recorders to skip those pesky commercials, it’s not surprising that a company like Jack Daniel’s would want to build its brand into the actual show. Elsewhere, everything from car brands to soda cans are popping up in television shows with increasing frequency.

The surprising part is that a company would want to promote itself through the characters in “Mad Men.”

Great television is filled with men and women who are morally questionable yet charismatic – you may not want to live Tony Soprano’s life, but you might well copy his drink order.

In “Mad Men,” the character who is supposed to be most sympathetic can ask a prospective client why she didn’t choose an ad firm with more people like herself (read: Jews), and then storm out of a meeting after telling her that he won’t let a woman talk to him like she did. Later, by way of apology, he’ll take her out for a drink and ask her why she doesn’t do something really fulfilling: get married and make babies. Apparently, in 1960, none of this was enough to lose the possible account.

The show’s characters are so one-dimensionally distasteful, and so eager to embrace the sexism and bigotry of the era at the expense, even, of an engrossing plot, that it’s hard to find anything alluring about them.

Click here for show details.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

You obviously you have no eye for historical authenticity.   Mayube watch the show and give it a chance.  Like it or not, this was the world they lived in back then.  Distasteful?  The only thing different about back then as opposed to now is that everything was on the table for everyone to see.  We still have sexism, racism, smoking and drinking etc, but in our politically correct world of 2007 we just harbor it in our hearts instead of lay it out for all to see.  No, I don't think that era was more distasteful...I think it was more honest.  And if you think that nobody thinks the way these people did, you are sadly mistaken.  Now its just all kept under wraps.
I totally agree with Mr. Doe. People are still the same, it's just hidden because it's not acceptable to show it any more. Things are ten times more screwed up now than back then. At least back then people were honest and straight forward.
For the first time, I have to agree with the comments. Mr. Doe and Mr. Smith hit it on the head. Now I was born a considerable number of years after this show takes place(1982) so I cannot speak from experience but I am well aware of the social and cultural history of our country. If I were to watch a show set in the 1960's that took out the sexism, racism, smoking, and drinking I wouldn't believe the show. The writers, directors, and producers purpose is not only to entertain but to make us believe it.
My father was president of the Trans American Advertising Agency Network in the 60's and let me tell you that the plot you describe was exactly the way it was, including the bourbon, dissing women and being arrogant towards Jews.
We were not a politically correct nation in the 60's...which in someways makes it a much better time...nowadays you can't say or do something without some special interest group or person ramming their fist down your throat.
I agree totally with Johns Doe and Smith.  The PC crap of today attempts to hide the reality of being human, with all its foibles, from one another.  It also serves to attempt to squelch the voices of dissent and discussion by wrapping them in a veneer of antisocialism.  If you watch the show and don't like it, don't watch it again.  Be glad you still have this freedom.
hey kids...were you even around back then. I doubt it or you wouldn't say such ridiculous things about how things were 'better back then'. I was around. Things may still not be perfect but they are better.
To me, I see how far we've come and it inspires that we can even go further.  David Anderson Columbus, OH
Sounds quite amusing to me.  Any what makes this more offensive than Ellen Degeneras or Dharma & Greg?  Both shows disgusted me.
Of course, if verisimilitude were their real goal, they wouldn't have used Jack Daniel's, which was a nothing brand in a relatively small American Straight Whiskey category in 1960.  I'm sure they could have more accurately used a blended Scotch, or even more realistically a blended whiskey like Seagrams 7 Crown (which was the undisputed #1 spirit in 1960)...but they don't have the $$ to pay for this placement, now that nobody drinks blends anymore, do they?  So the heck with reality when revisionist history is fully subsidized!!
So, let me get this straight -
Telling a woman that she will be really fulfilled by getting married and having babies is not distasteful?  It may be historically accurate of the repression of women in the 1960's, but still distasteful!  I think that there are many women who woudl agree that having children is wonderful, but not necessarily fulfilling.  If this were truly the way to be fulfilled, why aren't more men opting to stay home and raise the children?  

The reality is that men did not like the competition from women for their jobs.  Many of these men were WWII vets and Korean War vets.  In addition, the first wave of boomers were beginning their working careers. To a large extent the sexism of this period was driven by a desire to limit competition.  

On another note, what do you do with the years after your children are grown and on their own?  What makes those years fullfilling?  
Who? Me? A drunken lecher?  Thank you for the sincere compliment as I try very hard to fulfill that model each and every day.  Obviously, my dedication to purpose has shown some significant results.
Great.  Upfront biggots, racists, sexests.  Let's bring back puplic lynchings too...man was that up front and honest.....sheesh
It's amazing that people actually look at shows like this and complain about how sexist and "distasteful" they are.  This was real life!  Grow up, quit throwing hissy fits about everything that happens that you might not agree with.  In response to the other two John's, I think you're absolutely right.  People do feel the same as people back then, but it's harbored and kept inside.  And frankly, I think that's a lot more dangerous than getting it out in the open.  People are forced to keep their own beliefs inside while the "accepted" beliefs are crammed down their throats, which sure makes me pretty darn mad and I'm a pretty even tempered guy.  It's really sad how this country has changed over the last 50 years.  It used to be mandatory to be proud of your heritage, your beliefs, your thoughts and your COUNTRY.  Now it's only acceptable if you think, feel, and believe in what the rest of the herd tells you to.  
That kind of behavior was unacceptable then, and it's unacceptable now (drinking excluded).  The reason it's "under wraps" now is because no one wants other people to know how despicable they really are.  Annonymous posts are a perfect example.
As a long time JD drinker it should not go un-noticed that a great deal of the whisky's popularity was that it was 90 proof.    Over the years it has been watered down to it's present 80 proof, I still can not understand why they ruined a geat whisky.
Kudos to Mr. Doe all the way around!  I think the most brilliant POST I've ever read.  Nailed it on the head!  We live in a society where one word taken out of context or one "race bater" can destroy an individuals life.  It is high time for more realism, even if its in retrospect.
Ah, the sixties. When people called a spade a spade and had a gay old time.
You give a review of the facts, but your editorial makes no sense.  The show is based on true life interactions in 1960, not about how we think or how we think we are in 2007. Suggestion: find time to ripen your thoughts in a more mature light instead of providing us with your sophmoric commentary.  And, who said the viewers have to embrace a character so quickly?  Why not find the entire first episode alluring?
Watched the show last night - loved it. We need something to replace the Sapranos (although nothing really will)
I'm about to turn 50, and I can't believe how much things have changed, even  in the last 20 years. I used to have a great time going out after work for drinks!  YES IT WAS FUN! When everyone became so self-righteous, I dont' know.  My father used to give away a ham and a fifth of liquor away to all his customers at Christmas.  Now, he would be a horrible person for that!  Yes, people drank.  big deal.  And the "babies" comment was exactly how people thought and talked back then.  GET OVER IT. I'm really looking forward to this show.  
Who cares.  I drink whisky and make fun of Jews at work all the time...granted I'm unemployed and live in the park.
If you're curious about the problem with today's society just look at the 'Please Read' section of the msnbc.com website - the part right before you post your comment.  They won't even post your comment if it's too long, too harsh or too direct - keep it all inside folks and everyone will still wonder why you shoot up a public place
Mr. LPK with his comments on Thursday is full of it.! Seagrams  was top dog but it was "83" not "crown". My knowledge isn't 2nd hand.  Our family had a hotel and bar. As for J.D. it was also up there.  AS to the atmosphere of the program it is "fairly" accurate. Maybe in NYC or LA the bars had a constant haze of smoke thick enough to cut but in Va., PA. and Fla where I've lived that is pure fiction. I smoked 2 packs a day, cigars and a pipe and still didn't have a cigarette constantly in my hand or mouth as that program. This program is about as "Authentic" as the ones depicting the Mafia; true from the outside looking in but off base the other way around. Having lived through the '50's and '60's to me the program is rather stupid with no real story line
Entered Corporate America in 63,now retired.If this episode was from 1950,I would have found it more believable. Too much emphasis on their preoccupation with Blacks and Jews. It existed more passively,not openly and depended on the Industry. As far as the new sweet young thing making a pass at her boss ad taking on a mercy mission with the office groper on the first day,dream on. And what's with the Purple Heart,seven years after Korea? This show seems lost on the first day.  
Tony, Jack Daniels is technically not a whiskey, it's a bourbon. They may have ruined a crappy bourbon, but it was never a great whisky.  
Is Jack Daniels guilty of false advertising? It states on the label Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey.

I agree with David Anderson. I'm Black so as far as I'm concerned, things are a lot better now than they were back then. I can aspire to be more than an elevator operator or a waiter and can actually have an easier time attaining my goals now. In 1960, times were much harder for Black people than they are today. So you can have the "Good Ole Days". The only thing I would like to see today that we had then was the obsence of "Politcal Correctness". In my view, it's better to know what a person actually thinks and feels, rather than having them hand you a load of BS under the veneer of civility. If you are a racist, or a sexist, don't be afraid to show your true colors. At least I will know where you stand. That's how it was in 1960, and the show accurately portrays that era. Men drank, smoked, groped women at the office, called other people nasty things and went on with their day. No guilt, no shame. You can call me any kind of offensive name you want today, but you can't make me sit at the back of the bus.
This show as well as some others on cable tv make the Networks look more pathetic then they already are.

While the networks tout such trivial trash as "reality" shows,these cable networks have a window of opportunity never before presented.

The only reason reality nonsense has high ratings is a great many households do not have cable,I suspect that is about to change and like the big three auto makers,the big three networks will fade into the background as the little guy creams them.
It's trash, just crap, just as the era it attempts to recreate. To those who were not alive then, keep watching CNN, for history rewritten, just as this is.

Mad Men (Ad Men). Remember Bewitched? Remember artistic license? (remember when that was OK?) Mad Men is not so inaccurate that you have to whine about. Enjoy it for what it is or don't watch it. If one looks hard enough any era can be considered as the good old days (or the bad old days) depending on ones perspective. There are aspects of the early sixties I miss; there aspects of this year I dearly wish were missing.
I love Mad Men.  It shows a great time in America.  No workplace harassment.  No visable crime.  No whitetrash Jerry Springer contestants driving Toyotas to their trailer parks sipping on malt liquor.  Great show.
I agree that sometimes we get carried away with political correctness, but I wouldn't go back to the days of "openness" for anything -- even being young again!  :-)  The thing is, by keeping a lid on racist and sexist garbage we keep our kids from being exposed to it and perpetuating it.  In another generation or two, maybe we will have a much more egalitarian society.  Sure, some kids will still get the hate message at home, but much fewer than before.  The awful, hurtful things that used to be part of everyday conversation are no longer heard, and that is a good thing.
After reading most of the initial comments above, I'm now certain there is a "Mad Men" shill trolling Internet discussion forums and review board; Why? Because as on other sites lately, there appears to be rabid response to anyone or anything who critiques this show in anything less than a glowing light.

After watching the first episode, I was so miserable and bored I couldn't even consider watching again.

Miss. Linn's comments are correctly on-target. Perhaps AMC/Rainbow Media would do well to put their money in writers and producers and stop hiring hacks to troll the net in order to shill their bad programming.
All of you lamenting the passing of "the old days" fail to understand the underlying contempt toward women and minorities during that time. Being openly contemptful implied acceptability. It's not acceptable now and wasn't then. The difference is that now, we are grown up enough to point out the transgressions and try to remedy them.
I grew up in the 60's and well remember liquor and cigarette ads on TV, ashtrays everywhere including hospitals, Home Economics classes and virtually no organized sports for girls, etc.  Plenty of negatives in that era but what I miss is the sense of "American" as a group identity, as compared to the series of armed camps with lawyers that we have now.  To me "PC" is nothing more than Mind Police foisted by the intellectual elite on everybody else.  They're all for "tolerance" as long as you believe what they believe.  Not only race and gender but religion and politics as well.
this is history. this is the way america was. anyone who appreciates history-the way it really was-will stand up an cheer for this show. everyone else, keep your heads buried in the sand...denial is too easy.
gosh, I wish I could drink at work just like the good old days. :o(
The undercurrent of homosexuality on the show is interesting in that there really is no way to know for sure of the "historical accuracy." Are there any old gay men out there to clarify this for us?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):